Secular
Jinnah Pakistan Launch Day Speeches
Statements by speakers ..... Messages
from absent well-wishers
Saleena Karim's statement (read out by M. Ali
Khan)
I am very sorry I cannot be here
with you today but thank you all for coming to the launch of my
book, Secular Jinnah & Pakistan. I am honoured that the launch
is being held on the auspicious occasion of the Quaid-i-Azam's birthday.
I would like to thank Mr. Iqbal Saleh Muhammad, the
MD of Paramount Books for taking on my title and making its publication
possible in Pakistan. I would also like to thank Mr. Muhammad Ali
Khan, the General Manager, Publishing and School Division, for being
so helpful and doing everything to ensure the Pakistani edition
was finalised in good time. I would also like to thank Prof. Muhammad
Rafi, Lt. Col. Khan Adeeb Ahmed Umerzai and Mr. Maqbool Mahmood
Farhat, the three gentlemen who helped introduce my UK publisher,
CheckPoint Press, to Paramount Books.
Secular Jinnah & Pakistan is a book about
the political life of Quaid-i-Azam MA Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan.
It is also a case study of a battle over ideas - and especially
the Pakistan idea. Most importantly, it has shown the consequences
of what can happen when people choose to see what they want to see.
My research on Quaid-i-Azam's life and career began
after I stumbled upon a quote that highlighted a conflict between
two versions of history. When I learned that the quote was a fake
I released my first short book Secular Jinnah in 2005. Later
I began a much deeper study of Pakistan's founding history and this
book is the result of that study. From the beginning I have been
interested only in pursuing the truth, and hopefully this is reflected
in the book. I would like to see Secular Jinnah & Pakistan
read by students in higher education, not with an intent to impose
my own opinions but because the book contains an important message
about the need for objectivity in historical research. It is not
focused on what to think, but on how to think.
No history book can be treated as the last word. However,
every student of history must treat all available evidence honestly
and fairly, even when it does not fit his or her particular view
of the world. This is especially important in the case of Pakistan,
since the biggest questions about its creation are ultimately of
an ideological nature. Likewise, the individuals who have made history
should be treated with respect. Biographers must not and cannot
review events from their own personal viewpoint, but must be prepared
to see solely through the eyes of the person whose life story they
are telling. This was the principle I followed in writing Secular
Jinnah & Pakistan, and in so doing I discovered a man with
clarity of mind and purpose, integrity of character and an indomitable
spirit. The Quaid-i-Azam can teach us much about ourselves and the
kind of human beings we can all strive to be, if only we are willing
to learn.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
MESSAGES FROM ABSENT
WELL-WISHERS
Dr. Waheed Ahmad
sent the following message:
Unfortunately I could not be in Karachi for the launch
today. However, I have a high regard for Saleena Karim's endeavour
in her Secular Jinnah & Pakistan, and admire her expansive
study and use of a variety of printed sources to reach her conclusions.
In particular her correspondence with Mr. Bhandara throws new light
on Pakistan's attitude towards minorities. I wish Saleena the best
of luck and success in this and her future endeavours.
--------------------------------------------------
Mr. Khalid Sayyed sent the following message:
It is indeed an honour as well as a pleasure for me
to say a few words about Saleena's latest book Secular Jinnah
& Pakistan - What The Nation Doesn't Know, the real value
of which may not be evident to many as yet. Saleena has done what
should have been done 50 years ago!
Why was Pakistan created? What kind of socio-political
system was going to operate in the new state? What did the founder
have in mind as the 'real' cause and reason for Pakistan? Questions
like these have been asked since 1947 despite all the historical
and documentary evidence that has been there all along. Some of
the confusion on the part of the common man was definitely caused
by prominent personalities through Pakistan's history, such as Chief
Justice Muhammed Munir in his book From Jinnah to Zia and Zulfiqar
Ali Bhutto who once declared that the basis of the Indian Muslims'
demand for a separate homeland was economic. Another contributory
factor to the national confusion was the age-old question: What
is Islamic? Amid all this confusion, a nagging query about the integrity
and sincerity of Muhammed Ali Jinnah was always there.
Saleena has successfully and dexterously dealt with
these questions of national importance in a comprehensive manner.
Her book is a manual of the highest academic standard which should
set the record straight once and for all that the basis of the demand
for Pakistan was the Two-Nation Theory, that is, the Muslims of
British India were a nation separate from Hindus and, as such, could
not have a shared homeland; also that the founder of the nation
of Pakistan definitely wanted a non-sectarian Islamic socio-political
system in the new state based upon the teachings of the Qur`an,
the Muslim Scripture.
Saleena's work is commendable not only on the basis
of its content but also because of the professionalism that has
gone into its production. The author has delved deep into historical
and documentary evidence and has produced a work of quality. I admire
her resolve and hard work over the past few years that she has been
busy in researching and writing. The book is undoubtedly worthy
of being an essential part of Pakistan Studies in universities in
Pakistan as well as abroad. I can whole-heartedly recommend this
book to anyone who is interested in the study of the cause, reason
and aim of the creation of the state of Pakistan.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
Prof. Sharif Al Mujahid sent the following message:
I welcome Saleena Karim's Secular Jinnah &
Pakistan, especially because it represents a major breakthrough
on the much discussed acerbic issue of whether Pakistan was conceived
as an Islamic or a secular state. It also represents a significant
contribution to the extant body of literature on Jinnah's ideological
orientation.
That issue had acquired a new dimension and a new urgency since
the publication of Justice Muhammad Munir's controversial work,
From Jinnah to Zia (1980) wherein he had depended almost solely
on Doon Campbell's interview of 21 May 1947 and Jinnah's 11 August
address to assert that Jinnah stood for a secular state. Karim provides
an in-depth analysis of the "Munir quote", supplemented
by citations from original sources to show that Munir's version
of Campbell's interview is vastly different from the original text,
thus eroding the prime basis of Munir's assertion. In tandem, she
marshals an array of facts, quotes and arguments to demolish the
myths woven around Jinnah's personality one by one, and builds up
"a compelling case for a Jinnah who was neither a secularist,
nor a religionist, nor even a product of secular-Islam synthesis".
Refreshingly, Karim fulfils all the basic requirements of a first
rate work: meticulous research, copious documentation, analytical
rigour and lucidity of expression. Her book also opts for Milton's
free market place of ideas approach rather than going in for the
hackneyed selective exposure, selective perception and selective
evidence route, so popular with most Pakistani authors. Hence whether
one agrees with her or not, Karim is a must read for scholars and
students of Pakistan and South Asia. And, finally, with this work
under her belt, Saleena Karim may well claim a place among the core
Jinnah scholars.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
STATEMENTS BY SPEAKERS
Prof. Muhammad Rafi's statement (pending)
--------------------------------------------------
Lt. Col. Adeeb Khan's statement (full version
coming soon):
We had been reading a number of books
on the subject of Pakistan and its founder.
After reading this book I felt as if this was the book I had been
waiting for.Its not only the life story
of its founder and the nation-state he
carved single handedly.It has not only revealed the untold facts
but clarified myths and false reportings
about him.
A great effort by the author which
started from a simple research to clarifya
misquote which ultimately became a monumental research work and
the most authentic book on the life history
of its QUAID and the state he carved. Hecan
be rightly called in the Quranic terminology, a Muslim, of this
century.
Its recommended to be a reference
book on Jinnah and Pakistan for all public
and private libraries.
Back to top
--------------------------------------------------
Mr. Inam Khawaja's statement (full version coming
soon)
The first point I would like to make is that Mr.
Jinnah had deep knowledge of Quran and Islam. The Quaid was eighteen
years old when he went to London in 1892 he came back only after
four years in 1896. Before he went abroad he had studied Quran for
four and a half years in Sindh-Madarsa-tul-Islam where it was a
compulsory subject. His family was of Asna-Ashri school of thought
and lived in Wazir Mansion only a minute’s walk from the Karadar
Imam Bara which is the most important Imam Bara of Karachi in which
there are about forty to fifty Majalis per year. The Quaid therefore
attended about 350 to 400 Majalis by the time he was eighteen years
old. This and the Quran studies in school gave him deep knowledge
of Quran and Islam. His life consequently is a reflection of the
Islamic moral values he was imbibed with.
Secondly; there is not a single speech, statement or
writing of the Quaid in which he said anything in favour of secularism.
I have read all his speeches and statements from 1908 to 1933 once
and from 1934 to 1948 at least four times and can say with full
confidence that he did not even use the word secular or secularism
in any of his speeches.
Lastly I would like say that Quaid-i-Azam Muhammad
Ali Jinnah was a man of principles and steadfastness of purpose
was one of his qualities. Dr. Staley Wolpert in his book about the
Quaid’s speech of 11 August 1947 states that:
What a remarkable reversal it was, as though he
was transformed overnight once again into the old ‘ambassador of
Hindu-Muslim Unity’.
Wolpert clearly accepts that the Quaid changed his
views on the eve of the fulfillment of his demand for an independent
Pakistan. It is impossible for me to accept this because one would
be faced with another reversal because only after about two and
a half months the Quaid in his speech on 30 October 1947 said that:
We thank Providence for giving us courage and faith
to fight these forces of evil. If we take our inspiration and guidance
from the Holy Quran, the final victory I once again say will be
ours. You have only to develop the spirit of the Mujahids. You are
a nation whose history is replete with people of wonderful grit,
character and heroism. Live up to your traditions and add to it
another chapter of glory. All I require of you now is that everyone
of us to whom this message reaches must vow to himself and be prepared
to sacrifice his all, if necessary, in building up Pakistan as a
bulwark of Islam and as one of the greatest nations whose ideal
is peace within and peace without.
In his speech in Sindh High Court on 25 January 1948
the Quaid said:-
Islamic principles have no parallel. Today they
are as applicable in actual life as they were 1300 years ago. Islam
and its idealism has taught democracy. It has taught equality of
man, justice and fair play to everybody.
Is it logical that the Quaid espoused Islamic views
before 11 August became a secularist on 11 August and again became
an Islamist on 30 October and remained so till his death?
Back to top
|